Monday, March 31, 2008

A myth and a falsehood: Bush the "unilateralist"

Thank goodness the Wall Street Journal recently blew this falsehood to smithereens:

"Then came September 11 and the war in Afghanistan, which the U.S. continues to wage under a NATO flag. Unfortunately -- and despite the honorable exceptions of Britain, Canada and Holland -- few of America's allies in the theater are willing to commit more troops, much less put them in harm's way. Iraq is where the unilateral myth settled into media concrete. But in fact, in 2002 President Bush bucked the advice of his more hawkish advisers and agreed to take Tony Blair's advice and seek another U.N. Resolution -- was it the 16th or 17th? -- against Saddam Hussein. Resolution 1441 passed 15-0. True, the Administration failed to obtain a second resolution, not least because the French reneged on private assurances that it would agree to a second resolution if America obtained the first. But who was being unilateral there? As it was, the "coalition of the willing" that liberated Iraq included, besides the U.S. contingent, some 60,000 troops from 39 countries, who have operated under a U.N. resolution blessing their presence. The Bush Administration has since become all too multilateralist, even -- or especially -- regarding the "axis of evil." On North Korea, the Administration adhered strictly to the six party formula. Oddly, the same critics who decry "unilateralism" would prefer that the U.S. negotiate with Pyongyang directly -- which is to say, unilaterally -- and do without the help currently being offered by Tokyo, Beijing, Seoul and Moscow."

That's just an excerpt--read the whole thing.
The interesting question is why, in the face of the overwhelming evidence that the Bush presidency does NOT "go it alone", and has not done so, then why do so many in the news media continue to propagate the myth? I suppose it's because they can; the myth fits well into their ideological hatred of the Bush administration, and they know they can continue to push it in mainstream media circles almost without fear of contradiction. So they push it. I'm glad there's finally some pushback.