...but has few good reasons for her advocacy of Caroline Kennedy for the senate.
You can read her piece here.
Read the whole thing, carefully. Her arguments boil down to:
--no, she doesn't speak well, but who needs smooth-talking pols these days anyway, and being a smooth talker doesn't prove anything about whether you'd be a good senator. (Oh, but, don't forget, when friend Mo wrote about George W. Bush, suddenly then the fact that he didn't talk like some smooth 6 p.m. news anchor was oh, so important!)
--and hey, Caroline wouldn't be as bad as Al D'Amato or Bob Torricelli. Yeah, right--choose her! Cuz she's not horrible or corrupt...
I think Ms. Kennedy's problem has been that she hasn't convinced New Yorkers that she knows about policy, and the issues, etc etc---you know, the kinds of things senators will have to deal with--to deserve the job. And saying that, well, at least she's better than someone who got jailed for corruption...is no argument.
