Showing posts with label casualties; war in Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label casualties; war in Iraq. Show all posts

Friday, April 11, 2008

Good news from Iraq

Though you may never have heard it. Remember the recent Iraqi offensive in Basra?
Many in the mainstream media were quick to declare it a failure.
Not so, reports The Weekly Standard:

"The Iraqi military was able to clear one Mahdi Army-controlled neighborhood in Basra and was in the process of clearing another when Sadr issued his ceasefire. The ceasefire came on March 30, after six days of fighting, and was seemingly unilateral in the sense that the Iraqi government made no apparent concessions in return. By that time, 571 Mahdi Army fighters had been killed, 881 wounded, 490 captured, and 30 had surrendered countrywide, according to numbers tabulated by The Long War Journal. Thus, an estimated 95 Mahdi Army fighters were killed per day during the six days of fighting. In contrast, al Qaeda in Iraq did not incur such intense casualties even during the height of the surge."

Read the whole thing.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Today's good news from Iraq

From the invaluable Michael Totten (via Instapundit)

"You're probably safer here than you are in New York City,” said Marine First Lieutenant Barry Edwards when I arrived in Fallujah. I raised my eyebrows at him skeptically. “How many people got shot at last night in New York City?” he said.
“Probably somebody,” I said.
“Yeah, probably somebody did,” he said. “Somewhere.”
Nobody was shot last night in Fallujah. No American has been shot anywhere in Fallujah since the 3rd Battalion 5th Marine Regiment rotated into the city two months ago. There have been no rocket or mortar attacks since the summer. Not a single of the 3/5 Marines has even been wounded.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Putting casualties in context

No one wants to see any Americans die in war.
But we know it can happen; and it's fair to examine those who have claimed that casualties in a war are too high and excessive. (most agree that sometimes, in a just cause or when our national security is threatened, casualties can be justified. The question is when this is.) Take Iraq for example: "More active members of the military died during two years of peacetime in the early 1980s than died during a two-year period of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a government report. The Congressional Research Service, which compiled war casualty statistics from the Revolutionary War to present day conflicts, reported that 4,699 members of the U.S. military died in 1981 and '82 — a period when the U.S. had only limited troop deployments to conflicts in the Mideast. That number of deaths is nearly 900 more than the 3,800 deaths during 2005 and '06, when the U.S. was fully committed to large-scale military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan."

That puts the war, and the losses we've suffered in it, into more context.
You'd never know the above from reading some of the hysterical media coverage of it.